Which of the following is the antidote for the ANTIAUTHORITY hazardous thought?

The antidote for the ANTIAUTHORITY hazardous thought is indeed the guidance that emphasizes following established rules, as they are typically designed to ensure safety and effectiveness. This response addresses the irrational belief often held by individuals with ANTIAUTHORITY tendencies—namely, that they are above the rules or that the rules do not apply to them.

Recognizing that "Don't tell me. Follow the rules. They are usually right" encourages individuals to respect authority and adhere to protocols, fostering a mindset that values compliance and accountability. This approach is essential in military contexts, where following orders and adhering to regulations is crucial for maintaining operational effectiveness and safety.

In contrast, other options do not effectively counter the ANTIAUTHORITY mindset. For example, promoting a cautious approach, such as thinking first, doesn't directly challenge the notion of ignoring authority. Similarly, stating that something "won't happen to me" negates personal responsibility and awareness of risks, while suggesting that "rules are meant to be broken" reinforces the very ANTIAUTHORITY attitude that puts individuals and operations in jeopardy.